Context, purpose, and outline of project

In his essay “Through the Glass Darkly: Cinephilia Reconsidered,” Paul Willemen “identifies cinephilic pleasures as ‘something to do with what you perceive to be the privileged, pleasure-giving, fascinating moment of a relationship to what’s happening on screen’, a fetishising of fleeting details as opposed to examining the film as a whole.”

(from Jason Sperb and Scott Balcerzak’s “Introduction: Presence of Pleasure” in Cinephilia in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Film, Pleasure and Digital Culture, Vol. 1 p. 15)

The Pleasure Project is overseen by a group of film studies students (under the guise of Team Noir) who seek to explore the relationship between cinephilia and theory. If cinephilia is by definition a condition characterized by intense love for the cinema (suffix -philia Greek for friendly feeling toward or abnormal appetite or liking for), then where does film theory fit in? Does theoretical engagement impede pleasure or enhance it? Or does this knowledge encourage a different kind of pleasure (indeed, even inciting pleasure where none had existed before)?

Paul Willemen’s definition of the cinephilic’s “privileged, pleasure-giving, fascinating moment of a relationship to what’s happening on screen” is by no means a definitive rule or formula that can be used to locate the cinema-lover. This form of cinephilia is more of a starting point, a catalyst, to get people talking. If someone does not experience pleasure this way (through an either literal or mental replay of a particular moment in a film), then maybe he or she experiences it another way. Perhaps pleasure lies elsewhere: beyond fetishizing or passive viewing.

The interviews featured in this blog seek an elaboration on a defining cinephilic moment (as defined by the Willemen quote)

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Motivation and goal




At the end of August, I embarked on a cinephilic pilgrimage to Paris with the intention of visiting as many theatres and locations relevant to the history of cinema and my own personal growth as a film studies student. Equipped with a copy of Pariscope – a weekly magazine featuring screening times and locations – and Richard Brody’s Everything is Cinema: The working life of Jean-Luc Godard my goal was to experience a specifically Parisian cinephilic moment capable of mimicking the testimonies of individual directors, critics and film theorists I had come to admire. In Brody’s book, I had read that Jean-Luc Godard and Francois Truffaut regularly attended screenings at the Cinema Mac-Mahon and would often conclude their evening with a trip to a nearby cigar shop and critical discussion on their walk home.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Luca Caminati

I am not a cinephile

“Every fundamentally new, pioneering creation of demand will overshoot its target.” – Walter Benjamin, "The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility"




Masha Salazkina

An Immersive, “Transformative” Experience 
Stalker (Andrei Tarkovsky 1979)

VHS & Fetishism 
À bout de souffle (Jean-Luc Godard 1960)

Cinephiliac moment: an aesthetic experience


Cinephiliac moment: an aesthetic experience.

More video's from Masha Salazkina in Read more... 

Peter Rist

Fantasies of Flight 
Dumbo (Disney 1941)
Peter Pan (Disney 1953)

Formative Years 
Scarface (Howard Hawks 1932)
Citizen Kane (Orson Welles 1941)

Impossible Spaces, Impossible Time frames 
2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick 1968)
Tree of Life (Terrence Malick 2011)

Cinephilia or fantasy?


Peter Rist on Cinephilia.

More videos from Peter Rist in Read more...

Marc Steinberg

Theory and Viscerality 

In the Mood for Love (Wong Kar-Wai 2000) 
Naked Lunch (David Cronenberg 1991) 
eXistenZ (Cronenberg 1999) 
Lost Highway (David Lynch 1997)



Marc Steinberg on Cinephilia.


“To be a theoretician of the cinema, one should ideally no longer love the cinema and yet still love it: have loved it a lot and only have detached oneself from it by taking it up again from the other end, taking it as the target for the very same scopic drive which had made one love it” (19)